publicly accused<\/a> Dr. Anthony Fauci of using “verbiage” and trying to conceal the origin of Covid-19 because of his own involvement in gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.<\/p>\n\n\n\nUnlike the Chinese, Dr. Anthony Fauci had held ironclad to the sea-food-market hypothesis until just a few days ago, even as his colleagues had long begun to distance themselves from the theory with all due caution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Helen Buyniski concludes in her report that despite all the flip-flops, twists and turns, and changing advice and recommendations on the part of Dr. Anthony Fauci, the media would always have remained on his side. There had not even been the slightest criticism of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s statements in the media when he had started to contradict himself now and then. Along the lines of “Hey, who’s the practicing physician here, you or me?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to Buyniski, this helped create an almost untouchable and quasi-religious aura around the octogenarian professor, who was even nominated for “Sexiest Man Alive” of the year by at least one publication in a most amazing way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This does not change anything at the information-technical damage, which Dr. Anthony Fauci caused since Pandemie beginning as high-ranking advisors of the US government. His appearance on the infamous 60 Minutes program in March of last year, in which Fauci advised viewers not to wear face masks and insisted that this material, which was only sparsely available at the time, should be reserved for health personnel alone, certainly remains unforgotten.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nonetheless, state after state had subsequently instituted a mask mandate, leaving the American public in an unholy state of confusion. While Dr. Anthony Fauci later revised and retracted his statements at the time, the CDC, for its part, had intervened last April to require Americans to wear a face mask in certain locations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Amid the emerging chaos surrounding the 2020 political elections, Fauci had been doing his best to bolster his own credibility. When it began to emerge that states such as Texas and Florida, which had since officially shelved their mask mandates, were performing significantly better than states such as New York and California in terms of coronavirus infections and related hospitalizations, a change in the official narrative was needed, according to Helen Buyniski.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And suddenly, the focus was only on the vaccination campaign\u2026.<\/strong> When the vaccines finally came on the market, Dr. Anthony Fauci saw his chance coming. Suddenly dropping the bat theory, his full concentration from that point on was only on a vaccination campaign in the country that was progressing as quickly as possible, he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\nDr. Anthony Fauci had also joined a committee including well-known journalists, “fact-checkers” and political figures to fight so-called “disinformation.” With the topic of “disinformation” Dr. Anthony Fauci, referring to Helen Buyniski, seemed to be at least well acquainted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Suddenly it had been said on the part of the members of this committee that “they themselves are no longer convinced” that Covid-19 had come into being in a natural way. For this reason, it was necessary to investigate what exactly had happened in the People’s Republic of China in order to uncover related findings. Until that day, Dr. Anthony Fauci had been absolutely certain that the sale and consumption of bats – and therefore a natural origin – had been responsible for the coronavirus outbreak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Suddenly, all that information, which had been rigorously doubted and demonized for well over a year, came out into the open. To this day, there has been no official apology from those scientists and journalists who for a year had derided others – and deeper-digging minds – as “morons” and “conspiracy theorists.”<\/p>\n\n\n
DepthTrade Outlook<\/h2>\n\n\n It will probably take until the next Ice age for such an apology. It is certainly not a matter of being right, but rather of the way in which media obviously allow themselves to be harnessed in order to spread certain and selected narratives in public.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The fact that fewer and fewer people believe in these official narratives is certainly not surprising in view of current developments and events. Why is it that in a society that is repeatedly described as “open” and “plural,” such topics are not allowed to be discussed openly? Have you perhaps also asked yourself this question now and then lately?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
With the “lab leak” theory regarding the Covid-19 outbreak having quite suddenly and out of the blue gained mainstream legitimacy following recent reports by the Wall Street Journal and other American media outlets, and Dr. Anthony Fauci quite suddenly showing himself open to the possibility of a SARS-CoV-2 escape from a bio-lab, highly complacent establishment …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":2031,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[27],"tags":[62,80,100,101,55],"yst_prominent_words":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Labor theory: Evasive "fact checkers" - DepthTrade<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n